Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The airport isn't what it used to be, but still has some good connections. This spring I took a direct flight to Paris. Not bad...


sort by: page size:

I was replying to the above comment's reference to connections. It is fairly easy to fly into Paris and take a train to Lyon, for example, without having to go into Paris proper first.

It is pretty bad. CDG and Orly, the two Paris airports are atrocious in pretty much all aspects besides maybe transit options -CDG has regular commuter trains and high speed rail linking it to Paris and other cities.

That's why I was shocked that last time I was there, struggling to understand where i could find food at the late hour of 21h, a bathroom or an electrical socket that worked, that it has apparently been voted as best European airport by Skytrax for 2022.


I haven’t flown into Paris recently but there are plenty of exceptions: Berlin’s not beautiful either (though it’s one of my favorite airports).

But still the standard in Europe seems higher in general than North America.


As a French citizen, I'd like to object vigorously to the notion that Paris (if you mean Paris Charles de Gaulle, Paris' main airport) is one of the "better" airports.

If I believe wikipedia, Heathrow is actually Europe's busiest airport (CDG is next).


Wow. Paris doesn't look like its changed much.

As if there weren't traffic jams to/from the airport? You're in Paris, which has extensive public transport. Just use that!

Flying in from Paris. This is very cool.

Is it a good idea to rent a car / a motorbike -- how good is public transportation?


Looks OK from here (Paris, France).

I've been there every now and then over twenty years. None of this Paris isn't Paris any more. Pretty much normal changing of a city.

Europe does not look so good but I'm surprised to see Paris as number 11 (second European hub after London)

The US has at least a dozen Paris-es, including one or two states with two.

The only reason there's not far more confusion over these things is that a lot of these places are too small to have airports...


I was actually comparing both through the viewpoint of a tourist.

Paris was far and away easier to navigate, even though I don't even speak French.


Your statement really confuses me. You say Gare Du Nord because presumably you've been taking the Eurostar. Do you then take a rental car either way? (from GdN or from the airport). Seems like a nitpick to excuse your behaviour: that the traffic is bad in one specific area of Paris (as if it's bad only around there), so it means you'd have to take the plane...

This hasn’t been updated in nine years but it seems to confirm that there are only two:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airport_railway_stati...

But I suppose the majority of overseas travelers coming into France by air with the intention of connecting to a smaller city do so via Paris or Lyon. As European travelers seem to enter by car or go directly to their destination. At least that’s my impression from reading a few articles about tourism in France.


Wouldn't you be more likely to make that connection in Geneva rather than in Paris?

Wow. Paris hasn't changed that much other than the cars.

Still great to see some remains of the older Paris here and there, such as le Marais.

Improved in places. Got worse in others. https://www.airparif.asso.fr/actualite/detail/id/213

Some of the places where it got worse are far away from Paris… so who cares about the poor people who live in a far-away suburb near the freeway. It's not like they vote for Paris' mayor.


Paris isn't too bad, the drivers are used to cyclists and mostly courteous, even the charles de gaulle roundabout is doable.
next

Legal | privacy