Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I don't see how this isn't circular. The principle is about the choice of how to model things.


sort by: page size:

This seems circular to me.

This strikes me as circular.

seems circular

The author states pretty clearly why they are calling it meta-circular in the part you quoted; I don't understand the confusion.

Because the definition would be circular.

It isn’t circular at all. A immutable class of person is different than a pice of content.

There is literally nothing circular about that. You're just saying the same thing twice.

How is this circular?

Circular.

Got it. Make sense, I like the reason why you want to make it circular. :)

Them being circular has nothing to do with what are they representing. They are showing off the idea of hiding implementation through abstracting it. This is the exact same concept that both of these photos are showing.

That's circular.

I can't tell if this is circular because of the shape, or circular as in "circular economics."

That seems entirely circular.

That's a circular definition.

The last section in the link helped, but I have to say, the circle analogy made very little sense to me. Thank you for clarifying nonetheless.

That's still circular...

It's a completely circular definition (as far as I can see).

It just strikes me as a circular development pattern.
next

Legal | privacy