Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I can't believe he doesn't have a lot more subscribers and views than he does.


sort by: page size:

he's got millions of subscribers on youtube!

His YouTube channel alone had millions of subscribers.

If he had a conventional TV show nobody would be surprised. The number of people that watch his content is astronomical, every one of his videos has over a million views. He's much more heavily viewed than, say, cable news networks like CNN. Indeed, more people watch him than NBC, ABC, or CBS.

And viewers. As of now he has 235 million views.

He has 1,751 subscribers, this is something to think about.

Hes pretty popular on youtube though, just hit 1M subs

He is also the most subscribed youtuber at 109M subscribers IIRC.

That was a few years ago when he said he had 2000 subscribers. He doesn't say how many he has now.

Well, quantity vs. quality I guess. "Mostpopular", "tens of millions of views", "audience skews young". Thanks for sparing me the time of trying to sub him...

> I think his channel only hit 100k subscribers last year, so it looks like he might finally be getting some well-deserved recognition.

No kidding. Even if he hit 100K subscriber 2 years ago or at the beginning of 2015, he is at 500K subscribers now. If his growth hasn't slowed too much, he could be looking at [close] to a million subscribers before this decade is done.

His videos are pretty cool so far. Happy he is able to do this for a living.


That's interesting, he's only got about 300k-600k views for the same videos on YT.

That is rather what I am talking about. He posted 18 videos this week (I'm not counting the two from the last 24 hours) with an avg. of ~55,000 views.

There's a lot of noise and people have short attention spans, he also posts stuff willy nilly. So only some small fraction of his 700,000 subscribes see any one video, for the rest it disappears into their feeds.

His 360 Million views is still quite a lot, by definition there can only be so many accounts with such a high view count. And yet that translates to a check of only around a quarter million dollars.

This is great for a highly caffeinated individual sitting in underwear and recording his screen - it simply doesn't cover a cast and crew even if you improve the CPM by a factor of x10.

The truth is that TV advertising is very overpriced and just like newspapers trade physical print dollars for digital pennies the same thing applies here.


650k subscribers on FB too, with nearly 10m views on some of his facebook videos. That's where it's really taken off.

No, he has a following. I'd say most people have no idea he does lessons and streams video games on youtube.

Short answer: He has a youtube channel with 10m subscribers.

>subreddit have a lot of people condemning him and saying they're done with his channel

Yet he broke 50k subscribers on March 16 and he's at 51,798 as I write this comment. It's almost like you can say anything you want on Reddit.


His content is incredible. But prolific? He's posted three videos on his main channel in the past year.

I don't think it's particularly impressive.

He's not that different to a top-tier Youtuber or influencer of which there are hundreds who have managed to build successful content businesses with very small staff.

They are all just standing on the shoulders of the platforms and content creation tools which allows them to affordably produce and distribute high quality content to billions. Something which has never previously been possible.


he makes success seem so easy even though the odds are overwhelmingly stacked against someone else replicating anything close to his success, except for maybe a few people. when the barriers to entry are low means lots of competition. like muckbang videos. for every video that gets >100k views of someone shoveling food in his or her mouth, there are hundreds of videos that have just a few thousand to 10k views.
next

Legal | privacy