Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Why projects like http://wpf.codeplex.com/ and http://aspnet.codeplex.com/ ?

Why wouldn't they? The Developer community does some of the work for MS, and MS gets a bigger and happier developer community.



sort by: page size:

MS has many different orgs. Example: https://github.com/Azure

Which is why http://github.com/microsoft (and dotnet, and azure) doesn't exist, right?

Could it be this? https://visualstudio.microsoft.com/services/intellicode/

I was wondering the same thing, especially with MS being behind both.

edited: or this? https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/intellicode/cu...


I get the feeling that Microsoft has a lot of these things, but they're disparate.

e.g. code navigation [1], search [2] and CodeLens [3].

[1] https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#mscorlib/system/strin...

[2] https://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/docs/search/code/advanced...

[3] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn269218.aspx


It's weird to read all the complaints about how bad https://msdn.microsoft.com/ is. For quite some time all the documentation including what was known as MSDN is now on https://docs.microsoft.com/.

While I'm sure the complaints are valid (or was in the MSDN days) I believe Microsoft is putting a lot of effort behind these pages. You can provide feedback on pages that will result in a GitHub issue being created. You can even make pull requests.

While it's possible to provide feedback not all areas seem to process this feedback in a timely manner which of course is frustrating. However, the good parts (like .NET) are very good.


It's not like Microsoft doesn't have examples to draw on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FX!32

I know it's off-topic, but since you're a Microsoft employee: haven't the MSDN guys ever heard about friendly URLs? Compare: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Projects/Sp...

(I'm guessing this would be at least the milionth time they hear about it :) )


Microsoft is building a web component framework: https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/fluentui#/get-started/...

Looks like it's an old naming convention of theirs:

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173075(v=vs.80).a...

At least as far back as Visual Studio 2005.


Not sure how easier such target audience would find these alternatives,

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/makecode

https://smallbasic-publicwebsite.azurewebsites.net/ (partially dead)




Actually I noticed that they've recently started leaving off the .aspx extension on their MSDN pages.

For example: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/tt0cf3sx



Isn't this somewhat related to the goal of the Roslyn CTP (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/vstudio/roslyn.aspx)?

Not just that, but like, https://github.com/microsoft/windows-rs. Microsoft is a member of the Rust Foundation. etc etc.

A friend of mine actually does this. He's an MS hire. No wonder he figured it out long ago :)

http://coderuns.co.cc/


Is this related to being an MSDN member?[1] Is this another marketing channel to get devs to build for Microsoft target platforms?

[1] https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/profile


http://www.microsoft.com/business/startups/default.aspx might not be exactly the same thing, but its not like MS is sitting on the sidelines when it comes to startups.
next

Legal | privacy