Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The people and equipment have to be ready in case of a large emergency. In the absence of one, sending them along on an easy call is practically free.


sort by: page size:

I'm not sure how useful in general an unprepared person being able to call for help necessarily is. There is search and rescue (mostly volunteer) of course. But no one is going to assemble a rescue team at the drop of a hat.

Of course people need to be present or available for emergency situations, I think everyone understands that.

Exactly, and I'm sure they want to keep their lines open for the real emergencies.

To be fair having someone aware and around to watch and phone emergency services has a use.

I think an emergency could also require someone going in, like ambulance crew or firefighters and the likes.

Emergency services are so underrated. In minutes I can have medical experts, fire rescuers, or even a small army at my door.

And there's parts of the world where this is simply not a thing. We take it for granted.


It seems like this is a big advantage of the inreach in that you can text with EMS to convey if it is an urgent situation. You can also text friends/family to make alternate arrangements if the regular rescue people aren’t going to be fast enough.

It's plainly stated in the article: for emergencies.

Unless you as an individual are somehow more equipped to deal with emergencies than camp staff, I'm not sure being reachable would make any difference. I would hope in a real emergency, the first call would be to the appropriate emergency service regardless.

Are they needed in emergency situations?

SAR here in BC Canada vastly prefer that you call at the first hint of trouble, even if you don’t think you necessarily need help.

They would much rather be on alert and be stood down, or assist someone over the phone who called early and is easy to find and help. The problem is that many people wait until conditions deteriorate or they are much more lost.

Sending a team of a few people to go out and call your name along a trail during the day in clear weather is easy. Sending a team of people to find a hypothermic or injured person at night and extract them is an order of magnitude more involved and risky.

In other words, no one will be upset if you call out of caution.


We have many emts and fire fighters (medical training part of the job) waiting for something. Take those on call...

I agree with your point though, we can safely make a difference to someone, but statically it doesn't show up as we dare not spare that many people lest a real local emergency happen.


This is especially true in emergencies.

Emergency services.

Why does Teams need to handle emergency calling? What is the mandate that says it does?

Emergencies happen.

They were using it to communicate with people in need of rescue, so not really. No special equipment, etc.

Honestly that sounds like a better use case than some being described. It was clearly an emergency situation and someone could have presumably reached them relatively quickly. Maybe car breakdowns or getting stranded are the bigger deal.

Well, they need relay services to integrate with the local emergency services
next

Legal | privacy