Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Actually, no, and that didn't seem to be apparent in the materials posted. Do you feel like telling me or should I start playing 20 questions or consulting my talismans?


sort by: page size:

No, but good questions.

were there any questions?

Does it contain the Ultimate Question?

As far as i know these questions were answered more than 20 years ago.

It would be interesting to know what the questions were (or even what genre) - to get a better sense of the significance of getting them right.

Unfortunately there is no indication in this article, or the abstract of the paper, and the journal article itself requires a subscription.


How do you know? I couldn't find any example questions in the article.

It certainly clarifies a lot. Sorry for the 20 questions.

were the answers at least in the form of questions?

But I wasn't really looking for any particular answer. This was not a quiz. I was trying to figure out what they knew, and what they didn't know.

But I wasn't really looking for any particular answer. This was not a quiz. I was trying to figure out what they knew, and what they didn't know.

I don't think those questions are as separate as you imagine.

I'm interested what those questions are.

The article to which this is a follow-up answered your questions fairly comprehensively. Among other concerns: no, it's actually not that easy to predict what questions you'll get.

My answer is yes to all of the questions.

Yes, but I'm more interested in first resolving the first question (mine)

Maybe, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's not up to them what the questions are.

Did you answer all the questions?

About the majority of the questions I will get back to you. In terms of the latter - I wish I could have simply posted it — so absolutely, yes.

didn't they have planted questions too?
next

Legal | privacy