I just tried to do that on a Win7 machine sitting next to me and it didn't work... it doesn't seem to let me highlight anything at all? I normally wouldn't comment about something like this but I wanted to do this literally 10 minutes before I read your comment. Anyway I don't think it's controversial to suggest that the stock terminal on Windows kind of sucks, although I gather that PowerShell is pretty good.
I digress, but I think this is one of the most annoying things about Unix these days. I practically live by the command line; but terminals are terrible. We're basically emulating technology that was already getting obsolete in the 70s!
Plan 9 had the courage to shed this cruft by having simple text windows which have a prompt. No curser addressing and no crazy control codes. That makes rendering it just as easy (and beautiful) as rendering text box contents. I wish the Linux desktop environments would follow suit.
This bugs me as well. I use a tiling windows manager, so terminal windows are completely disposable to me, and I'll open and close them at will, often having double digit terminals open across 10 desktops.
My bash history does not reflect my use of multiple terminals.
I doubt it solves all your problems, but for the issue with terminals I recommend Go2Shell[1] which just adds an icon you can click to open a terminal in that window.
I'm sorry, but that sounds awful. I turn to the terminal when I want precise and exact control over commands - the above seems highly fuzzy and error-prone.
Thanks for this info! I have a terminal on my website that was still using the old version and I've been wanting to upgrade it and get better input/blocking support. I will give this a try.
At my new job, yes, but I solved the hideous problem by installing Babun, which is a package of a fairly good terminal emulator (mintty), cygwin, package manager, and my beloved zsh :-) I can use vim, grep, ls, find, sed, shell scripts, and much more. Like on Linux but without the possiblity to choose fluxbox as window manager.
reply