Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

the real reason is because Amazon wants to do business in China, so they absolutely cannot do something like that on their end without getting blacklisted by China's government.


sort by: page size:

I feel like Amazon has a moral obligation to name the country that is forcing them to do this under penalty of having their entire IP block black-holed.

I assume Amazon would not take this step unless that was going to happen otherwise, or at least I don't see why they would.

They don't need to make a political statement about it, just say they did it to comply with law / order of 'X'. <cough>Russia<cough>


Why would they do that? Amazon is no match for the US government and military complex and pissing them off is the worst business move they could make.

Why would they not want to? This is a serious business problem for Amazon, isn't it?

In any case, blocking web site access is an act of control that should only be expected in N. Korea or China. It's a shame and there should be legal case no matter what the reason that drives it.

Choosing what to sell on their merchant store is entirely a right of Amazon. Denied of access is not.


I’m always surprised when a government agency throws the masses a bone like this given all the lobbying and cohabitation of big business and government.

What’s the catch? Why would Amazon allow this?


It's relevant to the discussion considering I have no legal rights in China to protect my copyright and brand. Amazon is a USA based company that is ignoring my IP rights so they can profit by increased competition which reduces consumer prices.

Is there something preventing Amazon from doing so?

My hunch is that Amazon is desperate for this because of looming regulations. We regularly see companies that cozy up to the government get special treatment.

Why, exactly?

(It's also not what they are doing, since FTC filed against Amazon)


Can anyone fathom a potentially benign reason Amazon might do this?


Not sure why this is a problem. They could ONLY sell Amazon-branded items on their website if they really wanted to. It's their store.

Amazon's PR would have not allowed that.

Amazon didn't join because it would be nearly impossible to police their third-party sellers and their use of these factories.

Amazon could do it if they wished; they don't want to.

It seems from the article that they just wanted to extract money out of Amazon. Moreover, they never gave a single reason on why they didn’t want Amazon to have the domain.

But isn't Amazon risking that Souq itself might get banned in these countries if they allow this to happen? Or am I understanding it wrong?

Indeed, I don't understand how Amazon can claim they are fighting this, when they could just ban all resellers

I would assume it’s an issue of agreements with Amazon.
next

Legal | privacy