Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I'm not sure why you're being down voted. I find the lack of tactile feedback annoying and I can only imagine how it must be for someone blind.


sort by: page size:

Don't take this the wrong way, but it's obvious from this comment that you've never spent any time working with a blind person on an interface. This idea that a blind person would need tactile feedback comes from a sighted person imagining what it would like to be blind, not the experience of actual blind people with buttons vs touchscreens.

That's unfortunate, but I don't think the appeals of the iPhone are really that applicable to blind persons for reasons like this. A touch interface isn't going to work very well without visual feedback, even if the mentioned issues are fixed; it would be better to search for a device more well-suited.

A lot of modern designs have flat controls with no tactile cues that renders them unusable for the blind. Being able to connect with an app using VoiceOver makes the device accessible.

I've actually never seen any of the complaints you talk about.

I've never seen the buttons with a light in it - maybe NSW just never used them?

The "smaller metal lozenge" vibrates for the blind (and headphone wearing), plus provides direction. I've never seen people use it in confusion.


How does tactile feedback help to read for the blind?

Anything which is not tactile is bad if you ask me. That means capacitive buttons, touch screens etc. Even Star Trek shot themselves in an episode when a blind person had to use a panel:

http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Tactile_interface

Now I'm not partially sighted, but I'm not always looking at the display.


If it's designed for blind people, I don't think visually signaling its function is necessarily a great option (though to be fair, it would at least allow sighted people to point out the device to their blind friends).

I don't think that feature is intended for blind users.

I have no real knowledge, but I imagine that gesture interfaces would be massively worse than keyboard for visually impaired because the lack of tactile feedback.

Then why not go for an alternative approach?

Perhaps a capacitive touch screen with certain subtle audio and haptic feedback?

It seems like the mechanical approach current Braille devices use might've jumped the shark, and I wonder if the blind world doesn't need a system that's more easy to do in today's world.


As someone who is totally blind I would be interested in this if it ever got to a somewhat usable prototype stage.

> The few blind people I've been acquainted with have all seemed to prefer screenreaders to braille displays. It's not hard to see why. You need to move one hand off the keyboard to read braille (keep in mind that blind users are almost invariably keyboard-centric users).

Ergonomics/UX factors, as appealing of an explanation as they make, may not be the main reason; the fact that the vast majority of the blind don't read Braille may be a bigger factor (Braille literacy among the blind seems to be about 10% in the US.)


Touch typing while being pretty much blind is very difficult. It can be hard to even find the keyboard.

I'm visually impaired but not blind and I have to use touch to wash dishes. The idea of only using vision is disgusting.

That wouldn't be great for people like me who are blind.

So much for the blind users

I'm not sure, but I feel like if a feature for blind people couldn't be turned on blindly, that would be problematic.

I don't speak for the blind, but I guess if I were blind, I would dislike people not using what I wished I could use just because I couldn't.

I mean, it's super annoying for sighted people already, so it would just be on par with that experience.
next

Legal | privacy