> Yes, the other things I could have meant would have been odd, so I'm not sure why you spent time typing them out.
It seemed clear that you were either confused about what features were supported by S3, or not expressing your complaint correctly. The reason behind typing them out was trying to politely point this out, while describing some of the real-world use cases for using gzip'd files in S3 (partially to highlight why it would not make sense for S3 to gunzip files automatically).
I felt this would be a more useful comment than "you are wrong, you can upload gzip'd files to S3", or just downvoting your comment for being incorrect.
Yes, the other things I could have meant would have been odd, so I'm not sure why you spent time typing them out.
reply