Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I didn't downvote, but I found that your comment didn't add anything to the discussion. You said stuff about yourself, gave no new information, and invited polarizing comments.


view as:

You don't agree that it would be a good idea to figure out why a conservative would produce an incredibly rare vote for science?

Not only vote for science but promote science - not only science but taxpayer funded science without any immediate or guaranteed benefits to society?

We need to figure out why because I think we need a few dozen more like him.


The premise of your question is confused and unnecessarily inflammatory, and you provide no actual insight toward answering it.

Legal | privacy