Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> It's true some employees at the ethereum foundation had personal money invested in the DAO. Vitalik himself had a small amount invested as well. However, the Ethereum Foundation was not involved with the DAO.

The Foundation itself may not have been invested, but many of the members and core contributors were (Gavin Wood, core contributor of the Rust implementation, was rumored to have over $100k in DAO tokens).

> neither the creators of the DAO, nor the Ethereum foundation has kept any money that was lost in this unfortunate incident.

The hard fork, by definition, allowed everyone to keep what would have been lost.

And it wasn't an "unfortunate incident", it was a publicly stated inevitability, advertised not only by the platform (with the words "unstoppable code" on the home page) but by the authors of the DAO themselves ("Any and all explanatory terms or descriptions are merely offered for educational purposes and do not supercede or modify the express terms of The DAO’s code set forth on the blockchain;").

I didn't agree with the fork, and I choose to follow the majority of miners anyway because I still believe in Ethereum, but quit trying to rewrite history.



view as:

I think you've written an accurate description of what happened, doesn't really conflict with my comment.

Legal | privacy