I have lots of 25-year-old friends who would like to start a startup but decided against it. I'm trying to convince at least one of them to reconsider, since my cofounder quit yesterday and that leaves me a single founder. Their reasons are pretty varied, but include:
1.) One has Marfan's syndrome and needs to work at a place with guaranteed health insurance to cover his medical bills.
2.) Two would like to start a startup in the future, but feel that they don't currently have enough experience. This was also my reason for not founding a startup straight out of college.
3.) One was always interested in startups, but his family background has steered him towards law school, and so he doesn't have the technical skills to start a tech startup.
4.) One has a wife and two stepkids to support.
5.) One (my former cofounder) wants to start a startup, but got into Harvard Business School and figures a bird in the hand is worth 10 in the bush.
6.) One likes working for small companies, but enjoys his work-life balance too much to take the plunge and actually start one himself. He also doesn't desire the financial rewards that come from a successful startup all that much.
7.) One couldn't do it because he's on a student visa and it was doubtful that the visa would let him co-found a company.
They're all good reasons, and you can see that they're a lot more varied than them all being caged animals.
Those are great examples. I think the beginning of PG's essay has two issues that provoked most of the negative comments. He was playing around a metaphor instead of a clear situational simile, and then he left out the details of how these programmers looked like caged animals to him. The latter prompted follow-ups like this: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=142050
So instead of readers seeing this:
"MegaCorp programmers looked purposeless and embarrassed,
like caged lions, while they were doing the scavenger hunt"
they saw this:
"MegaCorp programmers who I saw at a scavenger hunt are
caged lions with something missing in their lives."
The first sentence wouldn't draw much outrage. The second implies those programmers act liked whipped puppies around their girlfriends, look confused at the gym (if they even go to the gym), etc. [The negatives will vary depending on how you view caged vs free lions.] The programmers don't just act like caged lions in a situation, those programmers ARE caged animals.
To be fair, the actual line in the essay is this:
"And seeing those guys on their scavenger hunt was like seeing lions in a zoo after spending several years watching them in the wild."
It's just preceded by lots of prose that reinforce the IS relationship.
Your post is one of only two uses on the web of the phrase "situational simile." However, it actually seems like a useful term. Did you make it up, or are you just one of the few cool kids to use it on the interwebs?
1.) One has Marfan's syndrome and needs to work at a place with guaranteed health insurance to cover his medical bills.
2.) Two would like to start a startup in the future, but feel that they don't currently have enough experience. This was also my reason for not founding a startup straight out of college.
3.) One was always interested in startups, but his family background has steered him towards law school, and so he doesn't have the technical skills to start a tech startup.
4.) One has a wife and two stepkids to support.
5.) One (my former cofounder) wants to start a startup, but got into Harvard Business School and figures a bird in the hand is worth 10 in the bush.
6.) One likes working for small companies, but enjoys his work-life balance too much to take the plunge and actually start one himself. He also doesn't desire the financial rewards that come from a successful startup all that much.
7.) One couldn't do it because he's on a student visa and it was doubtful that the visa would let him co-found a company.
They're all good reasons, and you can see that they're a lot more varied than them all being caged animals.
reply