Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Here is my cynical view: From what I know they have a history of not using their own tools. They didn't use SourceSafe, but Perforce. Then they made an effort to switch to TFS, realized that it sucks and moved on to git.

You can see the same pattern in Windows desktop apps. They didn't use MFC for themselves, didn't use Winforms, used WPF only a little.



view as:

UWP everywhere now though.

Is that true? Which larger app is written in UWP? Something like Office, Skype or Visual Studio.

Windows itself is gradually rewriting its shell components in UWP XAML.

There is a watered-down version of Office in UWP. The built-in OneNote is actually this UWP. It uses a different stylus filtering algorithm from the desktop version, which is why I don't use it myself, but rest assured it works just fine.

The preferred Windows client for Skype has been UWP for a while now (though up until recently it was still often referred to as "Skype Preview").

If they didn't use MFC, WinForms and WPF what exactly were they using? Flash?

Win32


WTL is way old.

Yes, but it's far newer than Win32 and MFC. There's also ATL, Active Template Library.

To be somewhat less cynical, VSS and TFVC were not intended to scale to the size of Windows's codebase, thus they weren't used. And instead of inventing our own thing this time around, we went with (and make contributions back to) the de facto standard.

When I was in Xbox, we had a lot of things in TFVC: all the services code, most of the console and Windows apps, and many of the tools. Only the Windows-related bits were in SD.


Legal | privacy