I've started using MOBAXterm recently and I'm sometimes frustrated by the lack of some basic features, like bookmarking directiories in SFTP browser, or built-in shortcut to user's home directory, both features present in my previous WinSCP tool.
On the other hand, MultiExec feature is nice for multi-node Wildfly administration :)
Try searching for "alternatives to x" ? x ? {software you use}. Usually someone has written about the two in comparison. In my case, MOBAXterm shows up on the second link (which is a list of alternatives).
This is a great site to look for alternatives to some common things. I love that you can filter by platform and license, and the votes are a rough indication of viability.
Nice to see more alternatives to PuTTY. PuTTY's lack of a decent website hosting has been the source of too much confusion including accidental downloading of malicious versions.
I don't have a anything to cite either, other than personal anecdotes.
This has happened many times to folks in my workplace. They come across the PuTTY download page and think that it's a shady looking site, and then continue looking elsewhere.
We instead just deploy putty.exe to everyone's machine directly now.
These aren't non-technical users - a lot of these are long-time UNIX/Linux sysadmins.
It's important to note that, especially in large environments, has different skill levels. I know a guy that can go deep into analyzing a kernel dump and figure out exactly what made some obscure application crash, but god help him when it comes to doing basic functions on his Windows PC.
Being good at your sysadmin job doesn't always correlate with correctly identifying shady sites.
There are still plenty of legacy green-screen (text based) applications alive in the corporate world that need to be accessed with an ssh or even telnet client.
I use to use PuTTY and then later MOBAXterm. PuTTY was a bit too simplistic for my taste and MOBAXterm way too much bloat.
These days I just SSH out of WSL using ConEmu (https://conemu.github.io/) as the console. Seems to fit my overall workflow the best and gives me a mostly common experience between my Windows and Linux systems; including essentially a tabbed terminal experience. I still use plink.exe from the PuTTY distribution so tools like Git on the Windows side can still behave like they do on Linux using ssh-agent.
I'm just writing this to help support your comment and ConEmu. I've been a windows-desktop linux-server dev for years and I haven't found a better experience than WSL on ConEmu. The common CLI experience between bash and powershell and the latest interoperability improvements of WSL have been a _massive_ improvement.
I use ConEmu on any Windows machine I'm forced to use, it works extremely well, has some nice shortcuts and is pretty customizable. I'd probably want to use it on my personal machines too, if it was available. But then again, it's the lack of a good stock terminal emulator that made it so good in Windows. Most *nix terminals are good enough by themselves.
As @Ineentho mentioned in another comment, I don't use username/password for ssh. I don't allow username/password for any system which I have responsibility (not even my local VMs for consistency's sake). I use ssh certs. My certs are passphrase protected, I enter the passphrase once at the beginning of a shell session and allow ssh-agent to handle subsequent logins. If I'm on a laptop at a client site in a cube or something, sometimes I don't use ssh-agent and retype the cert passphrase each
time I want to use it.
This WSL process is no different than I would do with a Linux desktop. On the windows side I do essentially the same thing except I use pageant and plink. This is only for tools which use ssh to access remote services and not for terminal access (as I mentioned I'm using WSL & SSH for that).
Does this feature exist in WSL? Not to my knowledge, but that could simply be that I haven't looked for it. I suppose if you're doing that sort of stored login credential thing, you could just write a little shell script which answered the appropriate prompts without too much trouble... I wouldn't recommend it, but you could probably get it to work.
You might want to think about it even in those cases; not so much for security, but just to open up your options.
It takes me never more than a minute or two to do the one time setup for certificates in an new OS install, whether Mac or Linux (at least for personal dev machines). And once done, I'm free to use any ssh tools which use certs, which should be pretty much all of them, rather than those that cache username/password... or compared to the username/password entry time. I definitely end up saving time by reducing redundant entry and by being able to use the best tool for the job sans any other gating factor.
Naturally, this is all preference and you're free to choose things differently than I would suggest... but did want to offer you some food for thought.
No they are saying that they would only need 1 PuTTY session to their jump server, and then run tmux from there, giving them "tabs" in the SSH session.
I've been using Xshell[1] and Xftp[2] (both are non-free licensed, free for personal/"home" use). Updated often, great interface, lots of features. Xshell comes with Xagent, its version of pageant/ssh-agent.
Same here. I've tried most Windows SSH clients, and XShell is by far the best I have used. It has a lot going for it. It's really well designed, frequent updates, and packed with features.
If someone is going to fix putty, please enable the right Alt key on American keyboards - we shouldn't have to hack our "registry" or the source of putty to enable it [0]. A simple config toggle would be awesome.
My preferred open source tool is Multi PuTTY Manager which has nice coupling to WinSCP. Otherwise I use SecureCRT though I imagine XShell is just as good at that level.
It would be great if they could keep their website up. I feel SecureCRT is worth the money, always have. However, another alternative http://smartty.sysprogs.com/
This project appears to have been abandoned. I note that there have been no updates since 2012, and that PuTTY has had several security updates since then. I'd be cautious.
I like tera term pro which has many features and BSD licence.Its rarely mentioned but has quite a few things up its sleeve.
https://ttssh2.osdn.jp/index.html.en
What about sending same commands to multiple servers at once and having possibility to align tabs into layouts to see them all? Look no more. There is SuperPuTTY that I can't recommend enough https://github.com/jimradford/superputty (some years ago there was PuTTY Connection Manager (outdated now). Screenshot here: https://i.imgur.com/rknybKS.png
SuperPuTTY saves me so much time and effort when managing multiple instances of the same application across multiple hosts.
Agreed. Some of the features of SuperPuTTY that I love are 1) ability to save sessions and restore at startup 2) flexibility of changing keybindins e.g. F3 to copy current tab 3) export/import of sessions.
Sent a request of True Colour (24bit RGB) standard [1] support to those terminals mentioned in the comments. Wasn't able to send it for KiTTY, something wrong with their captcha, and MTPuTTY itself - form is not loading. So if you can reach their developers - please do.
> Smart code. Native Win32 code - no need to have any libraries (like .NET, VB etc). Multithreaded automation tasks - freezing in one PuTTY tab will not freeze the other ones.
If it were smart he wouldn't be afraid to share the sources. How do we know there isn't a keylogger?
I did use MTPutty and then Kitty, but needing a mobile/tablet instance as well and tired of keeping .ssh copied to different devices to keep all of the connections & keys, etc. Was a pain, plus MTPutty did crash a lot for me.
Termius, I found to be the best SSH client that works on all devices & OSs, including my laptop on Ubuntu. It's not free but worth the small amount it costs to be able to share connection settings across devices.
... And the Dev has been responsive to requests, issues, etc. On Twitter for me also.
Yes, it's electron unfortunately. So you're basically downloading chrome with a SSH node module & some interface code. I'm not a huge fan of it either, and even run slack in browser to save on memory on desktops. But the main features I have been after we're checked with termius. One of them being the yearly subscription of $10, but if it helps keep the devs active on it, I'm okay with paying for software, especially if it makes my job easier. Which usually includes lots of time in numerous SSH sessions.
I switched to the newest version of SSH the minute the ubuntu subsystem for windows was released. All of the normal tools and a regular shell. Perfect!
My only complaint is that you have to run ssh as root to map ports < 1024 (a *nix security limitation) while in PuTTY you could just run as an average user.
MOBAXterm does have a full X server and X11-Forwarding which is very handy.
reply