The other part is significantly better hardware support (including powersaving and wider range of devices) which would also be completely undone by a unixy kernel.
I really kinda fail to see what would be gained by rewriting a piece of kernel that works just fine (well, except that ./ users would finally declare that they were right all along!)
I think the hardware support point is moot because if Windows did switch to Linux (Microsoft wouldn't but we are playing the "what if" game here) then hardware manufacturers would obviously port their drivers to Linux else nobody would buy their hardware. We've already seen this to be the case on Android for example. Plus Linux already has reasonably good support for older hardware.
I should stress again, just in case anyone misinterprets my comment, that I don't for one second think Microsoft will not should switch to Linux
They would port their new hardware drivers, maybe. It's the 20 years of backwards compatibility that keeps Windows strong in many places, especially government, military, corporate.
I really kinda fail to see what would be gained by rewriting a piece of kernel that works just fine (well, except that ./ users would finally declare that they were right all along!)
reply