Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I'm going to get downvoted to all hell but come on? All caps? Scales up forever?

reply



view as:

I say unlimited because concurrent reads were basically a non-issue for Snowflake. You could have as many users reading from the same table as you wanted.

Meanwhile "Redshift enforces a query concurrency limit of 15 on a cluster." http://blog.blazeclan.com/what-is-amazon-redshift-11-key-poi...

reply


Legal | privacy