> I don't accept that excuse. These were gathered by searching for phrases that should be included in their AutoModerator config. These calls for violence are mod enabled.
Clearly the CEO of reddit feels the mods of r/the_donald have done a reasonable job at policing their sub overall, despite having missed a handful of extremely lowly upvoted comments.
Do you suggest the AutoModerator filter for words like "hang", "kill", "shoot"? Why not implement that site wide? I'm sure that would go over well with the rest of reddit.
What pisses people off is how spez (reddit's CEO) is dancing around the fact that for a reason or another he can't/doesn't just punish a misbehaving subreddit while other borderline subreddits otherwise very cooperative but way smaller get shut down regularily.
It's a bit like how kids in a class get away with sticking gums two or three times on their desks "because they were quick to remove it" when other kids have their parents called the first time they bring a circuit board to school.
Reddit does what it wants, that's their platform. It just looks terrible on the face of it.
Agreed, reddit's ban hammer is often arbitrary and self-serving and r/the_donald drives too much traffic to reddit for them to seriously consider it for them (even more so with Twitter and @realDonaldTrump)
Admins should contemplate banning less, and users on all sides should chill on demanding it for subs they don't like. No one forces you to go to a sub, and you can even filter them from the front page without extensions now.
But live-and-let-live is not particularly in-vogue these days. As in this submission, the top post is (nothing to do with topic) "Why isn't this other sub also banned hmmm???"
> and r/the_donald drives too much traffic to reddit for them to seriously consider it for them
Ehh, it's not that, the sub is not really that active outside of a core group. Their user base isn't that involved either, none of the polls they post get any traction (that's why they stopped posting them) and for the most part frontpage posts get like 60-100 comments (unless it's a 'big' story). So it's not the traffic for sure, no matter how much they want to delude themselves about the 10 million invisible subs or whatever.
It's the press. Because like it or not they would be making a pretty big political statement by banning the sub, the main 'supporters club' for the currently sitting US president. Whatever ban reason will be picked apart and spun by either side of the press and the whole thing will become a big unmanageable mess, which is not something anyone would want to trigger. Better to wait it out until, for whatever reason, he's no longer the president. At that point I'm sure the rules regarding death threats, racism and witch hunting will be enforced a bit less leniently.
> No one forces you to go to a sub, and you can even filter them from the front page without extensions now.
Most people never come across The_Donald organically anymore anyway. Whether reddit tweaked their algo to stop that from happening or not, doesn't really matter because the objective of these people is preventing anyone from having an opinion that doesn't align with theirs.
https://www.reddit.com/r/RightAgainstTrump/wiki/violence
reply