Hacker Read
top
|
best
|
new
|
newcomments
|
leaders
|
about
|
bookmarklet
login
contoraria | karma 4 | avg karma 0.13
2018-04-23 15:13:39+00:00
|
next
[–]
update item
Wikipedia is, by my estimate, to 90% about animals, places, historic places, historic animals, historic people, "notable" living people, and so on. How's that going to be relevant on mars? And who's going to vet all the articles?
reply
view as:
tree
latest_first
F_r_k | karma 242 | avg karma 2.07
2018-04-23 15:18:40+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
Maybe, but those 1% remaining (thousands of articles) about physics, engineering, and so on are a goldmine if you are stranded without anything else.
It would be dumb no to take it as the complete dump is < 1Tb
reply
Legal
|
privacy
reply