I mean it as a self-deprecating way to decry the quality of the post without being too harsh. The author of the blog post had good intentions, but in my opinion he should have put it off for another decade or so, to gain perspective.

>No true Scotsman or appeal to purity is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect a universal generalization from counterexamples by changing the definition in an ad hoc fashion to exclude the counterexample.

edit: ok he didn't mean it that way!