> I'd suggest you go try a mirrorless camera with a digital viewfinder and report back when you have the prerequisite knowledge for this topic.
I own two of them. I also own a bunch of dSLRs too. I also am a professional photographer with decades of experience with camera gear.
I’d suggest you not assume things about others without having sufficient context, but at least you’ve now proven my assumption about you was warranted, despite not having enough perspective to prove it before.
It is a reasonable assumption given that you didn't know what a Viewfinder was, and keep insisting the screen on the back is one even now.
When your mistake was pointed out by multiple posters, you then doubled down, called the industry standard terminology that is likely older than either of us "pedantic."
It is fine to not know things, or to have holes in your knowledge. It isn't fine to keep on doubling down rather than admit obvious mistakes.
All you had to do was read the Wikipedia article on Viewfinders in the "decades" you've been "professionally" taking photos.
I own two of them. I also own a bunch of dSLRs too. I also am a professional photographer with decades of experience with camera gear.
I’d suggest you not assume things about others without having sufficient context, but at least you’ve now proven my assumption about you was warranted, despite not having enough perspective to prove it before.
reply