Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I find it incredibly easy to follow.

In fact, the thread on Twitter itself is even easier to read than this ThreaderApp link that some people demand.

The incessant bloviating from people who refuse to learn how to use Twitter is far more annoying tbh, it's starting to sound like old people complaining about the music being too loud, and it always derails discussion.



view as:

I know how to read Twitter and yeah, this one is really hard to read. It's got all these numbers with slashes behind them scattered throughout. It's got a list of numbers with slashes in the middle. It's got random links. It's got the occasional sentence without punctuation

It's just kind of a mess.

I was a heavy user of Twitter for multiple years. I've pulled back on it lately and it's really amazing how much I don't miss the weird, telegraphic kind of writing it tends to encourage. It really bugs me that one of our major means of communication forces you to filter everything through tiny text boxes that only recently became big enough for a whole sentence, and strongly discourages taking time to actually consider the flow of an idea through multiple paragraphs.


"This is why I can’t have conversations using Twitter"

http://antirez.com/news/82

I can't see how people use Twitter for anything more than shouting into the ether at each other. It's just so messy and rambly if you try.


haha, I looked at twitter for 5 min after it launched, I laughed really hard and closed the page. The thought process was something like "Oh, they've maximized unusability! I should now go and learn how to have a normal conversation.... I think not"

Then my life flashed in front of my eyes (by lack of better words) and I recalled a million lengthy conversations that pretty much made me who I am.

There was a funny video with a professor and a twitter "expert" where the professor argued it bad. The twitter fanboy kept interrupting him half way his first sentence until he got angry and asked if he could say something now. The twitter guy then said: But I already know what you were going to say. I laughed so hard. The conditioning clipped up his mind into 10 sec attention bursts then he had to talk to himself out loud again. Nothing of interest was said in the interview. The twitter guy thanked him and said it was a wonderful conversation. The professor frowned silently and looked at him from the corner of his eye. It was the best "what a fucking moron" face I have ever seen.


I find the opposite.

Brilliant writers like Corey Robin have no problem whatsoever using the platform effectively, often screenshotting longer thoughts. Sanders and AOC also good examples of puncturing, efficient communication.

the big losers are PR-types, and blowhards like Sam Harris, who are robbed of their smarmy techniques of soothing and ensnaring the reader with a lot of fluff and verbiage and rhetorical hedging and weasel wording.

when you're trying to express a thought clearly, or link to an essay, the platform works really well.

it works less well when your entire thesis is that nobody knows what they're doing, that people shouldn't take strong positions on topics, and that little people should sit down and listen to their superiors. cause on twitter the replies exist on the same level and status as famous-people-content, and so lots of emperors get exposed pretty ruthlessly


Legal | privacy