> There is no other reason you could have made that accusation otherwise.
I made no accusation. I inferred a straightforward conclusion from one of your unqualified claims about the dangers of importing intolerance into a tolerant milieu.
* White supremacy sometimes argues for violence and is intolerant of some types of people, so you don't want to accept white supremacists in your tolerant society.
* By formal analogy, Islam sometimes argues for violence and is intolerant of some types of people, so you also shouldn't want Muslims in your tolerant society.
The argument is the same, but you've asserted a different conclusion in each case. This is a special pleading fallacy. I've explained this twice now, so I really can't be more clear.
> And white supremacists want an end to anyone who isn't white
Not true, and it shows that you don't really know anything about the white supremacist movement, just like many people who hate Muslims don't know really know anything about Islam.
Removing people with a different skin colour from your country rather than simply murdering them all is called ethnic cleansing, and it isn't much better than outright genocide.
The fact that some white supremacists claim they would rather do that than simply kill everybody that doesn't look like them doesn't make pro-racism a valid viewpoint.
It's not a valid viewpoint anymore than pro-rape is a valid viewpoint. When you are arguing from the position of other races being lesser than you, you have lost all credibility and nobody is going to listen to you.
But you go ahead and tell me how peaceful and lovely some white supremacists are.
> When you are arguing from the position of other races being lesser than you, you have lost all credibility and nobody is going to listen to you.
Allow me to rephrase: "When you argue from a position that other religions are lesser than you, you have lost all credibility and nobody is going to listen to you."
Everything you've just said applies equally to a literal interpretation of Islamic dogma, to which many Muslims subscribe. So I ask again, as you seem fine with the forceful suppression or expulsion of white supremacists, by parity of reasoning, you must conclude the same result for Muslims or you are special pleading.
So you have one of three choices:
1. Admit your fallacious reasoning that you would like to treat Muslims and white supremacists differently despite having no rational argument justifying this
2. Admit that tolerance of both Muslims and white supremacists is justified.
3. Admit that intolerance of both white supremacists and Muslisms is justified.
The part where you accused me of being against Muslim immigration just because I said I was anti-ISIS.
You equated the two in your head. There is no other reason you could have made that accusation otherwise.
And white supremacists want an end to anyone who isn't white. That doesn't mean they want to convince non-whites to start being white, does it?
No, it means genocide, and I feel like you are being deliberately obtuse now.
reply