People are often not very apt at admitting their own mistakes. A self reported study like this probably isn't entirely accurate. You would have to analyze each of their expenses, such as what car are they driving, the size of their apartment, what they spend on entertainment, etc etc, in order to have a truly accurate account.
Why is this an increasing issue, since credit cards have been around for decades?
The article states "Middle-class life is now 30% more expensive than it was 20 years ago.".
I think this may be the major contributing factor to this.
No shit. Why buy gas, food and other line items that don't change much month to month in cash if you get cashback and rewards points for putting it on a card?
If you have the self discipline to not spend more than you make putting everything on a card and paying it down to 0 every month makes a lot of sense.
Sure you could screw up and wind up making monthly payments if you spend more than you make but that's not fundamentally any different than if you bought all the essentials in cash then put the rest on credit.
The article is intentionally misleading by talking about people "paying for things" with credit cards and then talking about credit card debt (no mention of how much gets paid back before the end of the month) implying that the month to month balance people are carrying is a result of necessities rather than large purchases.
This entire article is one large assertion followed by flimsy support after another.
I think "credit card debt" implies they aren't paying it off at the end of each month. Also in the article, it says the average credit card debt is 6,506, this is more than the typical American can afford to pay down on their credit card each month.
Are they considering all credit as debt? I don't think credit that gets its full balance payed on time is debt. Once you pay interest on a balance it becomes debt.
You're not in debt if at all times while you are using this credit, you actually have the cash to pay it off.
Then you're using credit for convenience, not as a loan because you don't have money.
People using crdit strictly for convenience, always paying their bill within the interest-free grace period, are not in debt (on account of that credit card).
Even people with significant loans are not necessarily in debt. If you borrowed $300K to buy a $400K home that is now worth $500, you still have a loan, but that is offset by equity in the property. It's not the same as borrowing to buy food, which is consumed and gone.
"In debt" is a loaded term which actually refers to a deficit situation, rather than the mere existence of loans. If we say, "OMG, X% of Americans are in debt", the reasonable interpretation is that are under financial strain due to actually running a deficit, not that some of them owe their friend ten bucks for yesterday's lunch because they forgot their wallet at the office.
They absolutely do. An interest-free loan that you know you will pay off on time is only "debt" academically. It's just shuffling money between accounts, effectively. After each credit card purchase, in theory, you could log in to your online banking and pay off the balance immediately with cash you have on hand in another account. You could do that even before the purchase transitions from pending to posted to your account. Basically, you're not in debt.
You're "in debt" when your liabilities exceed your assets. You have negative equity, and so these debts are claims against your future income.
That's what "in debt" means, in a nutshell: your future income belongs to someone else.
If we are going to write a story about how some population segment is "in debt", but we label everyone as "in debt" if they have any credit card balance, that is blatantly dishonest.
You are 'in debt' to the credit card company. They're 'in credit' to you. That's why they're called a 'credit' card company. When you spend your credit you're creating debt. When you pay your card off you're paying off debt.
"In debt to X" is not "in debt"; it's not how language works.
"In debt" is a loaded phrase which means that the interests against you exceed your assets. It's a common term, for which the more formal word is "deficit".
That's the interesting thing if you want a story on lots of people being in some kind of financial strain.
A temporary loan purely for transactional or cash flow convenience does not represent any sort of financial strain.
>In CNBC Make It’s survey, 32% of people said their discretionary spending was the No. 1 cause of their current credit card debt.
I'm never so glad to be an introverted technophile as when I find out how much my coworkers spend on amusement. They spend $200 a month on cable and Pay-Per-View while I watch Youtube and Netflix. They pay $65 for videogames and spend thousands of dollars a year on vacations. They sink hundreds of dollars into Candy Crush and Pokemon Go. They get the newest Galaxy Note every year despite only using their phone for Facebook and texting.
If you're a casual consumer in the 21st century companies and culture will eat you alive.
> They spend $200 a month on cable and Pay-Per-View while I watch Youtube and Netflix. They pay $65 for videogames and spend thousands of dollars a year on vacations.
What do these things have to do with being an introvert?
My strategy is, instead of budgeting or being as austere as I can, I set a mental threshold for how much fun or peace of mind or happiness a dollar is worth to me. If something is above that threshold, I spend money on it. If it's below that threshold, I don't. If I'm spending too much money, then instead of making a budget, I raise my mental threshold.
I'll spend money to have my lunch delivered because the saved time and mental energy is worth it to me personally. I will not spend money on a car that does anything more than get me around and run AC, because I'm not someone who gets great enjoyment from the car I drive. I am into gadgets and will spend money on the latest tech - even if I don't strictly need it - because I get proportional enjoyment out of it. I won't shop recreationally on Amazon for things I only kind-of want, even if they're very cheap or on sale. Etc.
> Basic necessities and healthcare costs may be sending some people into debt, but more people point to spending on non-essential items like clothing and entertainment as the main culprit. In CNBC Make It’s survey, 32% of people said their discretionary spending was the No. 1 cause of their current credit card debt.
> Another 9% say the majority of their debt comes from paying for travel. Americans spend an average of $483 a month on non-essentials such as dining out, entertainment, luxury items and vacations, Schwab’s 2019 Modern Wealth report found.
I wonder how this compares to past generations, and if it's more true now, I wonder what the cause is. More aggressive advertising? Propping up one's mental health in the face of a stressful socio-political climate (its effects greatly amplified by social media)? FOMO (also amplified by social media)?
if 32% of people say that discretionary spending is the number one cause of their debt, doesn't that cast at least some doubt as to whether economic inequality is the primary cause of this particular issue?
Why would an increase in economic inequality increase discretionary debt? The wealthy would pay it off, and the poor would be tightening their belts (or at least not loosening them).
The broader problem definitely has to do with inequality, but this slice of it is surprising and really probably doesn't relate to that.
It's also interesting to note that Trump's tariffs are estimated to cost Americans about 800 a year, or about 2 months of discretionary spending, yikes.
Is it just about convenience and unrealistic expectations? Cooking can be cheap, eating out teens to be more expensive, but many of us feel we have to do it. Few people take a sandwich to work - many seem to rather buy it.
The same for "how to holiday". Holiday means today taking a plane (or in the case of USA long distance driving as well) and staying in a hotel (or Airbnb and then eating out). What happened to cheap holidays like camping and hiking? Am I just in the wrong crowd these days or has this mostly faded out?
"American have an average of $6,506 in credit card debt, according to a new Experian report out this week."
Although credit reporting agencies have a funny way of calculating debt, which is used for your credit score as well. It's just your current balance, even if you pay it off every month and aren't in "debt". It's hard to tell from the report how they are calculating debt, but I bet it is the amount of money on the credit line waiting to be repaid, even if it isn't costing interest.
Plus, if you wait until the statement due date (which is basically a free extension of the loan, so a good idea, as long as you have automated bill pay that will make sure it makes it right under the deadline), this means that number is likely your past statement plus whatever your current purchases are. You don't control when the credit companies look at your balances, and for mine I was surprised that they were basically reporting 2x my normal revolving credit card usage over the month. I use my credit card for everything if possible, since I get 2% cash back on my Fidelity card (which is great, BTW), as well as great fraud protection and the ability to automatically get an electronic record of every transaction.
> The real question is how much of the accounts are delinquent
Wouldn't how many people are carrying a balance each month (and thus paying interest, implying they very likely can't afford to pay off the balance each month even if they wanted to) be a better measure? The average worker in the US barely nets $6,500 in three months, they're definitely not charging and paying that much off every month.
Sure, you could look at that, but just because you carry a $6,500 balance isn't too terrible as long as you are paying it off. If you're just paying the minimum payments and not charging anything new, it could take many years to pay off that debt. The number might also look very similar for many years, even though you are paying it off. I think that's why people who can't even pay the minimum or aren't paying is a truer sign of economic distress. If you aren't paying off your credit card, it's likely you aren't paying off other debts as well, things like rent or mortgage - or will be soon if things don't improve.
Which gets a little more complicated when some people have grace periods, and others dont because they carried a balance. You cant just use average statement balance.
The number to look for would be: average balance subject to interest.
There are very few people in America who can pay off a $6,500 credit card bill the same month. $6,500 a month is $78,000 a year and that's before taxes.
After rent, 401k, and taxes you'd need to be making $200,000 a year to make that practical. Well over the 90th percentile of income.
Small correction, it's not a monthly amount but rather the statement amount of last month plus this month's spending, so I'd reduce that number by roughly 25%. I don't argue with your other points.
Using debt to pay for basic routine monthly expenses makes a lot of sense in my mind. There are extra consumer protections when you do this, and benefits from credit providers to do it that can add up. I use debt to pay for all my expenses except for my mortgage payments, which is just servicing of another big debt.
How many of the 25% have a smart phone released in the last 12 months and premium cable? Go to bars every week? A statistic like the headline is meaningless without a lot more qualification.
Some people are simply irresponsible and bad with money. It should be quantified.
People also use cards to accumulate points, and credit cards are easier to fight against fraudulent purchases vs debit cards. So it's not even a fair measure.
"25% of Americans simply make no money and are going to starve" is the reading the press wants us to make to make us click. The truth is probably closer to what you say.
I make less than 20k a year. Somehow I am able to eat healthy food while living in one of the more expensive metro areas. I have no debt, and even have a little extra at the end of the year to speculate with sometimes. Luck I suppose. It would still be cool to have a full time job, but we can't all have those, apparently.
When an American says they have roommates, do they literally mean they share a bedroom with another adult they're not romantically involved with? Or does 'room' mean the whole apartment?
Shared kitchen and bathroom. It's not ideal, but it's also not worth paying twice as much in rent for exclusive use of those two rooms that I only need for an hour a day or less.
In college, everyone used roommate for someone in the same bedroom and apartment-mate or suite-mate for someone in the same unit. For us, a suite lacked a kitchen and living room, but did share a bathroom.
As others have said, roommate generally just means living in the same apartment. It's a weird term though, in that I wouldn't use "room" to refer to an entire apartment.
People generally underestimate their food budget. You go "into debt" buying food because you didn't expect it to cost so damn much. But the real problem is rent (also mentioned in the article, but not the headline), which erases up to 2/3 of our income. Without much headroom, it's easy for costs to blow way past limits.
The article also relies on those with debt to assess the cause of their credit card debt, but those with debt are rarely financially literate.
>In CNBC Make It's survey, 32% of people said their discretionary spending was the No. 1 cause of their current credit card debt.
reply