When I started working two days a week a colleague of mine said he was jealous and wished he could do the same. While he agreed that objectively there was absolutely no reason he couldn't actually do the same.
Isn't it about setting priorities? What stops you from for example spending less time on your side business and more time reading? Please don't take it as judgemental, I am really curious.
> When I started working two days a week a colleague of mine said he was jealous and wished he could do the same. While he agreed that objectively there was absolutely no reason he couldn't actually do the same.
Spoiler warning for a season 1 episode of Black Mirror: this is precisely the gut-punch realization delivered at the end of the "future" "sci-fi" episode Fifteen Million Merits. It is set in the future, and it is sci-fi, but it is not at all about the future or about sci-fi—it's entirely about now. A horrible, pointless, sterile existence—but where are the enforcers, if this is some kind of dystopia? Robot drones, cyborg lackeys of the system packing heat, sadistic future-cops? There are none. Not a single one. Perhaps the outside world was ruined so there's no escape? Oh, but no, it wasn't. It's right there. The episode's given us no reason to believe anyone who wanted to couldn't walk right out into it. But they don't. And neither do we (mostly).
Isn't the enforcer a lack of money for most people? You can "walk out" progressively by saving aggressively but it takes a while, if it's even possible. You can take a more extreme route but it's far from a trivial achievement.
It's largely the comfort and familiarity. Yeah you could walk away, but there's so much risk. So back to your stationary bike to make little pellet things for some reason, eating food out of a vending machine, while watching reality TV and decorating your virtual avatars using Merits you've earned at your job of dubious actual value, anxious always that you'll fall down a rung on the social ladder (while, of course, mocking those who have).
[EDIT] at least as the episode depicts it, which is very much a slice from a range of middle-ish class perspectives. Fussellian middle-class anxiety certainly appears (though not the full scope of it) and perhaps is most prominent, but there's more going on than just that. The episode's not trying to be about everyone, I don't think.
[EDIT EDIT] I think the key components of that episode are that 1) the system they live in is starkly meaningless, divorced from anything recognizable as value in practically any ordinary sense and in almost every single action they take, 2) nothing like a jack-booted thug, even broadly, ever features—the closest thing we get is "cuppliance" which is bad, sure, but given how passive it is and in the context of the rest of the episode, reads almost like an escape hatch for the writer rather than an intentional part of the thrust of the story, 3) an attempt at actual rebellion at the system is smoothly and efficiently coopted by the system—some clear ironic self-criticism from Brooker, that—and 4) our final shot reveals that they may well be able to just walk away any time they like.
(some people like to wonder whether the windows at the end are real or screens, but between what precisely they depict, which is not some remarkable vista or wilderness but a fairly ordinary one, and the context of the rest of the episode, I don't think there's a ton of ambiguity there)
When I started working two days a week a colleague of mine said he was jealous and wished he could do the same. While he agreed that objectively there was absolutely no reason he couldn't actually do the same.
Isn't it about setting priorities? What stops you from for example spending less time on your side business and more time reading? Please don't take it as judgemental, I am really curious.
reply