Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> Why can't he impartially present his guests ideas and let his audience decide for themselves what is BS and what is not?

Because at that point it's just an infomercial.



view as:

I'm not sure his guests are paying to be on the program, I don't think I've seen too many shilling for some product on his show.

But, even if you consider it an infomercial, I don't see what the problem is. Don't like what they have to say? Don't watch. Not sure you can trust his guests? Don't watch.


You don't have to have a product to be shilling something, and it doesn't have to be a paid infomercial to be an infomercial.

I feel interviewers who push their guests to confront and address the rougher edges and ramifications of their beliefs are more valuable to their listeners, and will preferentially watch/listen them instead as a result. You're welcome to disagree if you like.

The Intercept's Mehdi Hasan is a good example of someone who won't let a guest dodge a tough issue - his interview of Erik Prince is a must-see for the benefits of a more confrontational approach, IMO. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/mehdi-hasan-caught...


So, I said 'what's wrong with how he does what he does', you say 'because it's an infomercial', I dispute and then raise 'what difference does that make' and your answer is 'I don't like infomercials'.

So, because you don't like infomercials, Joe Rogan shouldn't do them?

> I feel interviewers who push their guests to confront and address the rougher edges and ramifications of their beliefs

I feel I'm smart enough to figure out for myself if someone's claims or beliefs have rougher edges and ramifications. I don't need someone to ask these questions, if they go unaddressed, I make a determination as to why.

For instance "Drink this koolaide and you'll go to heaven." I don't need someone to question that, I'll be sure to question it on my own. Did the person espousing such a belief do enough to substantiate their opinion during the interview or not?


I think doing infomercials instead of an effective interview is a disservice to the listeners.

"I'm smart enough to figure out for myself" is sometimes true, but it's also what gets us anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists.

Joe Rogan can do whatever the fuck he wants, just like I can criticize his choices.


"Infomercial" is a weasel word in this context. An actual infomercial is a paid promotion, often with a direct marketing avenue attached to it. Rogan's podcast is neither of those, regardless of one's issues with presentation and interview methodology.

Legal | privacy