Hacker Read
top
|
best
|
new
|
newcomments
|
leaders
|
about
|
bookmarklet
login
sadfklsjlkjwt | karma 159 | avg karma 1.89
2019-10-30 16:14:18+00:00
|
next
[–]
update item
Fortran from the 1980s is still supported...
reply
view as:
tree
latest_first
cik | karma 2500 | avg karma 4.01
2019-10-30 16:28:23+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
Hell, I fixed something in Turing last week. My eyes are still bleeding.
reply
pletnes | karma 1915 | avg karma 2.33
2019-10-30 11:42:10
|
next
[–]
similar comments
You misspelled the 1960s.
reply
gowld | karma 8809 | avg karma 1.33
2019-10-30 17:25:11+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
And yet almost no one chooses to write new Fortran code for applications. We rely on a few ancient critical widely used libraries like BLAS, accessed from non-Fortran programs.
reply
greglindahl | karma 9606 | avg karma 2.0
2019-10-30 18:22:59+00:00
|
next
[–]
similar comments
This is not true, there are niches where Fortran is still dominant for new code.
Also for BLAS, the underlying code is usually no longer Fortran.
reply
greglindahl | karma 9606 | avg karma 2.0
2019-10-30 13:22:28
|
next
[–]
similar comments
Fortran from the 1960s is still supported. Almost all modern Fortran compilers support syntax that was deprecated decades ago.
reply
Legal
|
privacy
reply