>A leader that fires people for challenging relevant mainstream opinions is not any kind of leader I want to work for or follow.
There we go...most of the skepticism about self-driving cars appears to be driven by ideology and less by the actual evidence. "Mainstream opinions"...it is not an opinion, there are literally thousands of these cars being tested/piloted and improved upon constantly.
Might it take a little longer to get to nirvana? probably, but it borders on delusion at this point for anyone to say it will never happen.
>There we go...most of the skepticism about self-driving cars appears to be driven by ideology and less by the actual evidence. "Mainstream opinions"...it is not an opinion, there are literally thousands of these cars being tested/piloted and improved upon constantly.
You can't provide evidence of something that hasn't happened, and level 5 autonomous vehicles haven't happened. All you can provide is evidence of things we have already achieved, and use that to support a strong opinion that we will be able to achieve more things.
Anyways, back to my original point, firing someone for having an informed counter-mainstream opinion is the sign of a weak and petty leader.
There we go...most of the skepticism about self-driving cars appears to be driven by ideology and less by the actual evidence. "Mainstream opinions"...it is not an opinion, there are literally thousands of these cars being tested/piloted and improved upon constantly.
Might it take a little longer to get to nirvana? probably, but it borders on delusion at this point for anyone to say it will never happen.
reply