Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The solution is easy: full data portability laws that "backs up" into a centralized database (could be blockchain to avoid manipulation) - and then each platform sets its own rules, and users then can utilize the platform of choice for their UI and UX - design and governance.


view as:

This will not address the loss of audience that happens when Wikileaks followers are using Twitter for updates. You must own the interface to your audience, not just your data.

Maybe not the first time a specific type of offence occurs - but each bad action of a controller/leader will result in a migration the size reflective to the proportion of each offence. I don't disagree that people will benefit and will be necessary that people have their own, non-centralized interface.

Legal | privacy