Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

In both cases it doesn’t actually work. In the case of the data-backed nonsense it’s been used to justify holding people past their prison sentence. In this case it’s demonstrably worse. In the general case anything that’s “sciency” but doesn’t actually work leads to bad outcomes because people are far more likely to buy into it or at least less likely to call out obvious BS.


view as:

>In the case of the data-backed nonsense it’s been used to justify holding people past their prison sentence.

I'm not sure why you assume that it's keeping people in prison and not being used to let them out.


From https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23655017 (your GGP) and supposedly originally https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/adamcurtis/entries/78691781-c9b7... :

> In America this is being used to decide whether to keep them in jail even after they have served their full sentence.

That may not be true, but the reason why they assume that is that basch and/or the BBC said that.


Legal | privacy