Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Right, so there is land ownership. One group of people (comune members) keep another group of people(non-comune members) off of their land by essentially a threat of violence. This seems not at all different from the system practiced in, say, the US.


view as:

The difference is that it's seen as an inherent right of the community, not a title that can be freely transferred to the highest bidder.

Legal | privacy