Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

And I'm not advocating for that, especially given the amount of garbage on the Internet. But the pendulum has swung too far in one direction and many people are scared to voice their opinions for fear of being rejected or worse, outcast from their livelihood and their way of life.

What the writer is saying is that she no longer feels that The Times is unbiased. I don't see how that's a hard thing to take at face value.



view as:

> I don't see how that's a hard thing to take at face value.

How about I say the Times is unbiased.

Ok now what do we do? Do we take it at face value?

I might be misunderstanding what you mean, but it seems like you are in fact advocating ... 'that'.


Legal | privacy