Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There is no way you can get even close to the same capacity as a subway.. not even for a point to point setup.

Minimum train space with pretty standard signaling can be as low as 90s. With modern moving block systems that can be pushed even lower. The tube trains have a seating capacity of around 250 people and 800 people can be standing. This gives a capacity of between 3 and 12 people per second.

How are you going to inject 1 car per second (to reach the lower level) into the tunnel in a safe way? And even if you could do it - Consider how huge the stations must be. They have to contain 100+ cars plus space to enter/exit them (couple seconds to come to a stop, 10s of seconds to leave the vehicle - with some people quicker than others -, 10s of seconds for other people to enter the vehicle, couple seconds to accelerate and synchronize to the flow..).



view as:

Cars on freeways already regularly do sub-2 second spacing. If each vehicle had 7-16 people (as TBC plans), you’d get similar to Subway capacity.

Folks who dismiss getting subway-like throughputs haven’t actually done the math.


The planned capacity is however only 4400 people per hour for the CES tunnel so about 14s spacing (some other projects even lower). One train every 90s has a capacity of more than 10000 people (and that's not even rush hour with any people standing).

Sub-2 second spacing is quite unlikely to be used, since stopping distance (with 0 reaction time, which is not too unreasonable with LIDAR/RADAR) dictates around 2s spacing between vehicles (1.9s at 100km/h for teslas I believe). And while humans might be fine with ignoring safety aspects computers can't and shouldn't.

Nevermind that building a subway-light vehicles (more similar to a people mover) is not really the same thing as using slightly-modified Teslas as subway replacement (which is what it seems they will be using for now)..


Legal | privacy