Democrats protect wealthy schools from undesirables by preventing people from choosing which school their kids can go to. Unions slow societal progress (Police and Teacher’s unions for example)
> Democrats protect wealthy schools from undesirables by preventing people from choosing which school their kids can go to. Unions slow societal progress (Police and Teacher’s unions for example)
Aaand you lost me. This sort of poorly thought out Ayn Rand POV is unfortunate to see so often here on HN.
I'd also wager that your blaming of democrats here is obviously flamebait and is against the rules. There's no interesting discussion to be had when you just dismiss an entire portion of the population right off the bat. Nothing to engage with when you've already decided I'm part of some conspiracy to keep kids from having a decent education.
The fallacy is assuming a given school can be fixed in less than 10 years. There are public schools in Detroit exposing kids to enough lead to cause measured behavioral changes.
It seems reasonable to hand those families a check to help them to escape than to keep perpetuating the injustice.
The wealthy have very good schools.
Democrats protect wealthy schools from undesirables by preventing people from choosing which school their kids can go to. Unions slow societal progress (Police and Teacher’s unions for example)
reply