Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> The name is childish and doesn’t inspire confidence either.

Good point. Not like "Google" or "Bing".



view as:

Exactly.

They should just call it "Bang" or "Bangs" and be done with it :)

bing's not a good example here - everyone took the piss out of its name when it was released (and it still said in mocking tones), and it isn't all that popular as a search engine either.

I think they were being sarcastic

Funny... Google was a name specifically coined by a child so he has no leg to stand on with that complaint

No, that's not the story I know.

The name google was name chosen after Googol (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Googol) to reflect the amount of webpages that in the founder intentions they were about to index.

Apparently when they registered the name the officer/employee was not familiar with the concept and just wrote down the name as they thought it was written: Google.

edit: source: https://www.webcitation.org/68ubHzYs7?url=http://graphics.st...


And Googol was coined by a 9 year old.

"Coined by a child" and "sounds childist" are separate concerns though.

Legal | privacy