He's not suggesting pure functional programming - and beyond a certain point the simplicity associated with functional programming will be completely negated by the complexity of the arguments.
From my understanding of what he said, I doubt that he'd advocate for pure functional in circumstances of significant necessary complexity.
He's not suggesting pure functional programming - and beyond a certain point the simplicity associated with functional programming will be completely negated by the complexity of the arguments.
From my understanding of what he said, I doubt that he'd advocate for pure functional in circumstances of significant necessary complexity.
reply