I don’t disagree with your above claim of people trying to get a rise out of others with inflammatory speech online. I have seen it too but... it sounds like the rest of your argument is very politically motivated (and anecdotal).
I was going to say "touché", but I don't know if you read my above comment before it was flagged, because you're implying I argued something that I didn't. The idea that Parler would not be subject to the typical cancel-culture tactics of "progressives" impersonating right-wingers and posting incitement to violence in order to get a platform that allows conservative thought shut down is ludicris. Thus a screenshot of something outragous before it was moderated away from Parler, is hardly an honest argument.
It seems a bit rich to suggest that the opposing view on the question on organized mass censorship of the president of the united states is "too political".
reply