This is also incorrect. "Prevention of disease" and "prevention of infection" are two related but clinically-distinct objectives for these vaccines. So far, early clinical trials were generally testing the first objective, and less so the second. It is thus not "marketing speak", but precise language about what was actually tested.
That's completely false. An infection is an invasion by a foreign pathogen, a disease is a set of observed symptoms[0].
For other examples of infection/disease distinctions, see HIV and AIDS.
[0]: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK235412/
reply