> they decide on a conclusion they want to make, and then interview enough people so they can cherry-pick the comments that support their conclusion, and don't bother to present any dissenting viewpoints.
I've said this exact thing in the past about NYT. This seems to be their MO these days and is especially apparent in their international reporting.
I've said this exact thing in the past about NYT. This seems to be their MO these days and is especially apparent in their international reporting.
reply