So by that logic I could advertise coffee beans as handpicked by child slaves and you could buy my product completely guilt-free? I don’t think it’s functionally any different from arguing you aren’t a murderer simply because you’ve hired a hit man. Maybe you didn’t directly do the bad thing but you’ve paid someone to do the bad thing on you behalf. At a certain point isn’t financially supporting the bad-actor tantamount to supporting the bad action?
Yes, of course, supporting people or businesses doing bad things is bad. But the comment I was replying to seemed to imply that in fact, the company doing the bad thing was -not- to blame and those buying from them are. In addition, your scenario requires that consumers have full information. I can tell that a product is made in China by the label. I can't tell if they are dumping noxious chemicals into the river behind their facility. The company on the other hand, knows.
reply