Also the refrigerants matter - unfortunately, the MOST efficient ones also happen to be really bad for the ozone layer so they've been "banned" (there are still plenty of units out there using them - just can't use on new systems).
So there's always a trade-off. You pay for this or you pay for that. And if its energy, you have to consider the material and energy supply chains or you are probably bullshitting people and yourself.
Ultimately an air con is a heat engine so Carnot's law applies. No possible magic beyond what thermodynamics allows.
ALL TOO MANY "inventions" summarily . You even have UC Berkeley getting into the con-game with the Water Seer (which claims violates thermodynamics). You'd THINK UCB wouldn't ever push physics-violating ideas but NOPE. A stain on the engineering school reputation!
So there's always a trade-off. You pay for this or you pay for that. And if its energy, you have to consider the material and energy supply chains or you are probably bullshitting people and yourself.
Ultimately an air con is a heat engine so Carnot's law applies. No possible magic beyond what thermodynamics allows.
ALL TOO MANY "inventions" summarily . You even have UC Berkeley getting into the con-game with the Water Seer (which claims violates thermodynamics). You'd THINK UCB wouldn't ever push physics-violating ideas but NOPE. A stain on the engineering school reputation!
reply