> Children cannot get irreversible surgery in the US. They may be given puberty blockers, which are completely reversible
You say this, but it’s not supported by longitudinal studies.
In any case, the change in their development is not reversible. You can’t send them back in time to have those years again.
> and only until they're adults and able to make a decision for themselves.
Ok - so the decision to medically alter the course of their development is made for them, at a time when you admit they are not able to decide for themselves.
> And none of this happens without the consent of a board-certified physician who is under oath (and the threat of lawsuit and/or losing malpractice insurance) not to do anything to harm the patient.
Which is increasingly happening in other countries.
And why does a doctor get to make this decision without the parents?
> Why are doctors deciding that minors with healthy genitalia need to have them surgically altered?
> Also, wait until you hear about circumcision. You're going to be really outraged at the surgical alteration of minors with healthy genitalia then!
I am in fact outraged at the practice of circumcision. Aren’t you?
No true Scotsman is transgender, either.
> This is the subject of conservative misinformation[1].
It’s also the subject of high quality investigative reporting:
https://www.amazon.com/Irreversible-Damage-Transgender-Seduc...
> Children cannot get irreversible surgery in the US. They may be given puberty blockers, which are completely reversible
You say this, but it’s not supported by longitudinal studies.
In any case, the change in their development is not reversible. You can’t send them back in time to have those years again.
> and only until they're adults and able to make a decision for themselves.
Ok - so the decision to medically alter the course of their development is made for them, at a time when you admit they are not able to decide for themselves.
> And none of this happens without the consent of a board-certified physician who is under oath (and the threat of lawsuit and/or losing malpractice insurance) not to do anything to harm the patient.
Which is increasingly happening in other countries.
And why does a doctor get to make this decision without the parents?
> Why are doctors deciding that minors with healthy genitalia need to have them surgically altered?
> Also, wait until you hear about circumcision. You're going to be really outraged at the surgical alteration of minors with healthy genitalia then!
I am in fact outraged at the practice of circumcision. Aren’t you?
reply