Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

The same issues happen with most biotech production. As you try to scale you need different bioreactor geometry bc the amount of heat, co2/o2 distribution, and waste build up in proportion to side wall area of the vessel changes drastically. Also genetic drift increases as you increase the population of microbes, making it difficult to keep your target organisms on the right metabolic path. Amyris biofuel is a good case study for why biotech fails during the scale up.. https://www.fastcompany.com/3000040/rise-and-fall-company-wa...


view as:

Manufactures and researchers/professors have been trying to push bioreactors onto civil engineers for wastewater treatment for years, because they're infinitely configurable and admittedly are neat, but they can't come remotely close to scaling up like a traditional WW treatment plant or even an activated sludge plant.

It's always seemed to be an inherent limitation of bioreactors.

Which tells me that the solution these people need to be looking for will resemble something between a wastewater treatment plant and an oil refinery, but in any case, steady state manufacturing, not bioreactors and batches.


I agree about WW design being the current scalable form of bioreactors. There are steady state type designs of bioreactors - called chemostats.

Legal | privacy