Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

We can all read it how we like it: “Climate researchers ignore undesired effects”, or “contrarian outsider is cherry-picking results”. Intention or not, this serves only as flamebait and it will get us nowhere.


view as:

Are you suggesting that the author should censor himself to appease extremists on both sides ?

I would say that on the contrary, this kind of blogpost can be useful to make people that can still change their mind to think about this issue.


Legal | privacy