Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Assuming it's not outright foul play, it's prob more likely that the matching services intentionally boost your profile gets better reach/impressions as that's a +EV play, and reduce your profile reach when you're subscribed long-term.

To carry this thought exercise more, someone structuring this system could also treat hot/responsive/engaged profiles as an asset of retention and intentionally matchmake the results to optimize for a system to be engaged (vs to matchmake two people who find love and unsubscribe after).



view as:

Which part of this is not foul play? Man, our standards are low.

/me shrugs

Sounds like 'outright foul play' to me. Vs. what, bully for them they saved the genuine matches to the time that was most profitable, my custom most at risk? That's not foul play?

(Maybe I should disclaim I've never used any of this, so my standards are high/low/irrelevant, but ...)


Legal | privacy