Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> To be fair - this is fairly common for most subjects and models are exactly that: models.

At least, I would have expected the model to be either right or useful.

Neil Bohr's atom model is neither.



view as:

> Neil Bohr's atom model is neither.

It enables stoichiometry, at least...


It's just a simplified model. It's often used for teaching the context of chemistry (1900s?) and is used as a stepping stone for teaching orbitals and energy states so I think it's a useful tool for pedagogy at the very least :)

Legal | privacy