Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

You have yet to explain how racially unfair outcomes in the criminal justice system are the intended result of actions by the political right.

I point out those on the political left have been involved in all aspects of the crafting and enforcement of these laws.

You have made no other argument than to point out that disparate outcomes in the criminal justice system exist.



view as:

Here are two links.

Marijuana (though nothing to link explicitly to gop): https://www.aclu.org/gallery/marijuana-arrests-numbers

Jury of peers, very explicit from gop: https://www.themarshallproject.org/2019/08/07/racism-tainted...

I'm not an expert; these are the first two things I stumbled on in verifying my position. I don't believe you are discussing in good faith, goodbye.


> I don't believe you are discussing in good faith, goodbye

Are you capable of discerning between bad faith and disagreement?

I actually believe what I am arguing: that cancel culture in the present moment is dominated by the Left.

Do Republicans and people on the right do bad stuff? Absolutely (even if i disagree about many of the particulars). But cancel culture is far from the only critique I have of the Left.

This is not about "which side is worse" in the broader picture. I'm trying not to simply turn this into a political mud-slinging contest. I'm trying to get at what cancel culture actually is (you know, the topic of this thread).

In response, you made a claim that certain things were examples of "cancel culture" coming from the right. A claim you have thus far still utterly failed to defend.

If all you want to do is complain about every bad thing a Republican ever did, then I agree this discussion should end.


Because you do seem genuine I will describe why I find this discussion to be in bad faith. You rarely (if ever) grant a charitable interpretation to my statements. You (almost?) always extrapolate my comments to the most extreme and weakest position. You seem to mostly be interested in "winning" and are funneling the conversation to points you find yourself most comfortable and strongest in. You regularly attack me as a person.

I find it unlikely that if I were to surface information and/or an argument to you that you did not know, that you would incorporate it into your world view. It seems you would dismiss it and focus on other aspects of the discussion and/or extrapolate the new argument to an absurd extreme thus making it irrelevant.

> In response, you made a claim that certain things were examples of "cancel culture" coming from the right. A claim you have thus far still utterly failed to defend.

I think this is the crux here. I offered a potential alternative explanation for why we might see more "cancel culture" from the "left" than the "right". Simply that the "right" often has more effective and lower risk options in "cancelling" a person.


Legal | privacy