Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

but also ensure my content is not a target of DDOS, I expect and pay them to "dictate what browsers are permitted to access" my website.

But those two issues are orthogonal. Assuming a non-DDOS scenario, do you really want to keep users or specific browsers out just because of their choice of browser?

Anyway, the update from CF seems to clarify that they aren't just blindingly blocking specific User Agents for the most part, which strikes me as a Good Thing.



view as:

> But those two issues are orthogonal. Assuming a non-DDOS scenario, do you really want to keep users or specific browsers out just because of their choice of browser?

Yes, yes I want to prevent whole classes of user agents from downloading my content. I'm talking about user agents such as python scripts. Those clearly reflect traffic not from real users, and potentially malicious, and it makes absolutely no sense to fulfill the requests, let alone pay for it.


Sure, that makes sense. I was only speaking in terms of actual browsers.

Legal | privacy