Doing all the things YouTube does, like transcode videos, gets complicated quick.
At the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, we created our own video hosting site, https://mediahub.unl.edu/ (https://github.com/unl/UNL_MediaHub) to self-host videos for when avoiding government or k-12 firewalls is desirable as well as integrating with rev.com for captioning.
It's really unfortunate that higher education hasn't banded together more often to develop projects of mutual interest.
It might be a nice business for someone to put together "eduTube" - a video platform for educational institutions. It would have a annual fee per organization based on size.
It would:
* allow archiving, or display with sunset on certain lectures
* be available to university libraries, lecturers and student projects.
* have less stringent content rules because educational
* allow each institution could dictate what their rules were
* allow institutions to determine who got what type of access
I would do it, but I am kinda soft on the video transcoding skills. Maybe UNL could work on expanding the service, with a fee, to other universities.
Your point about coordination is a great one. In a perfectly rational world, even and economically self-interested one, there are many ways that the thousands of educational institutions around the country could pool their money to build something better than YouTube for their use case. But coordination is hard (I certainly don’t have any magic answers) so they each roll the dice with YouTube itself
At the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, we created our own video hosting site, https://mediahub.unl.edu/ (https://github.com/unl/UNL_MediaHub) to self-host videos for when avoiding government or k-12 firewalls is desirable as well as integrating with rev.com for captioning.
It's really unfortunate that higher education hasn't banded together more often to develop projects of mutual interest.
reply