Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

What is the argument here? You want us to use law theory from before the industrial revolution or something?


view as:

Some sort of pesky "constitution...?"

> What is the argument here?

That limiting the administrative state is far from a monumental changing of the rules. Nobody is challenging the administrative state per se. The major doctrines principle is just being expanded, which limits Chevron, something that only came into being a few decades ago.


That's an OK summary of FedSoc talking points, but you're missing some of the barbs. Might want to try again.

The effective reuslt of the non-delegation doctrine is that, when Republicans do not like a policy outcome, Congress is required to employ a time machine to give explicit instructions to an agency decades ahead of time.


Like the federalist hacks quoting 13th century jurisprudence??

Legal | privacy